Politicians would love to have
Pope Francis’ approval ratings.
His popularity crosses party lines and spills over the borders of the
tiny state he heads. The spiritual leader of the Catholic Church may
be the most influential and galvanizing leader on the world stage. Leadership
traits alone cannot fully explain the “Francis effect”.
Leadership is more than a mastery of skills
Francis is a case study in
leadership; he has every attribute that shows up on checklists for good
leaders. He is willing to take risks and to effect change. He delegates and allows
people to do their jobs. He seeks advice from different voices, including
dissenting ones. He will act unilaterally if necessary. He puts the good of the
organization first. And, while good leaders are accessible, Francis finds novel
ways to be present to people. He leads by example.
Politicians share many of these
traits. Yet, as we are seeing during this election campaign here at home, as
well as south of the border, few politicians enjoy the same level of popularity
as the pope. In my view, this is
because leadership cannot be boiled down to a checklist of behaviors.
Leadership requires more than the
mastery of a set of skills. An
outstanding leader also communicates, through words and actions, the person
that he is and the values that inform his life. We might refer to this as the
leader’s spirituality.
Apart from all of his leadership
qualities, I think that people are attracted to the spirituality of Francis. His humility and respect for others
reflect his understanding of service, and his commitment to placing people, not
dogma, at the center of his papacy.
Politicians should take on the smell of many different sheep
It would be unfair to make a
direct comparison between the leadership style of Francis and those individuals
presently seeking the top job in the nation. After all, Francis does not have to worry about getting
elected or coming up with a platform that appeals to a majority of voters. But there is one page from his playbook
that national party leaders might consider imitating.
Francis inherited a church rife
with problems. He identified one of these problems as clericalism, the focus on
privilege, status and power that separates priests from the people they are
supposed to serve. One way to combat the tendency towards clericalism is to
take on the smell of sheep.
“Priests”, said Francis, “should be shepherds living with the smell of
sheep.”
Our national party leaders say
they walk and talk with ordinary Canadians. They speak eloquently about what
the average Canadian thinks. Each of them would have us believe that he alone
has the pulse of the nation. But,
it is obvious from watching the televised coverage of the leaders’ tour that no
one is taking on the multitude of smells that permeate the pasture.
The majority of people who attend
the campaign events are party faithful. In fact, some events are by invitation
only. Campaign organizers
carefully select the individuals who stand adoringly behind the leader, nodding
in agreement as he presents his platform and denigrates that of the other guys.
The political backdrop of faces
sends a visual message of diversity and support for the leader. The group is
there to make the leader seem like one of us, to humanize him and the party’s
policies, and to persuade us to enter its sheepfold.
image courtesy of khunaspix at freedigitalphotos.net |
Our national party leaders are accustomed
to the smell of their own sheep pen. That is not necessarily bad, but it limits
perspective. Leaders may miss the bleating of dissonant voices with good ideas;
voices that could help the country become more prosperous and equitable.
This hanging around at the center
of one’s pen does not end with the campaign; it makes it way into government in
the form of partisanship.
The center of the sheep pen does
not afford a complete view of the pasture. As Francis observed while visiting a
parish at the edge of Rome shortly after he became pope, “We understand reality
better not from the center, but from the outskirts.”
In an election campaign, party
leaders try to convince voters that their party has the best ideas. After the
election, the top dog would do well to seek perspectives and incorporate worthy
ideas that come from outside the party fold.
No comments:
Post a Comment