Are the Bishops of Brazil and
Pope Francis on the same page when it comes to the 2014 FIFA World Cup, or did
the Bishops miss their CEO’s memo?
At the start of the tournament,
the National Conference of Bishops of Brazil added their voice to that of
Brazilians who for months had been protesting their government’s lavish
spending on the tournament. When millions of Brazil’s citizens lack basic needs
and are living in poverty, the construction of enormous stadiums was hard to
justify.
The bishops issued a brochure in
the shape of a “red card” to express their concern “regarding the inversion of
priorities in the use of public money that should go to health, education,
basic sanitation, transportation and security”. They were concerned, too, about the displacement of the homeless, and an
increase in sexual tourism and human trafficking.
The bishops want the 2014 World
Cup to be more than “bread and circuses”, more than a well-orchestrated
government distraction from Brazil’s social and political challenges, and are
pushing for reforms. Through a campaign called “Steilpass” (translated either
as “the decisive turning point”, or, in soccer lingo, “assist”), the Brazilian bishops, in collaboration with the
Conference of Religious in Brazil, presented the Brazilian government with ten
proposals focused on building a more just society. Among the proposals are calls for universal health care,
access to a complete public education, meaningful work for all, promotion and
protection of youth from violence, respect for cultural diversity, and democratic
control of justice and the media.
The bishops’ message to
government seems to stand in contrast to the cordial message of Pope Francis on
the opening of the tournament. While Francis makes no overt references to
Brazil’s problems, the shortcomings of human relationships are implicit in his
message.
Francis looks at the world’s
beautiful game as a metaphor for the improvement of the human person and,
therefore, of society. “Football”,
said the pontiff, “can and should be a school for building a ‘culture of
encounter’ which allows for peace and harmony among peoples”.
Francis draws three lessons from
sport that can contribute to peace.
The first is the need to train so that one can grow in virtue. The second is to look to the common
good because “in life, when we are fominhas
(individualistic and egoistic), ignoring those who surround us, the entire
society is damaged”. And, the
third is to respect both one’s teammates and opponents. The pope indicated that
teamwork and respect for others are key components in winning both on the pitch
and in life.
“No one wins by himself, not on
the field or in life!” said Francis, adding “that by learning the lessons that
sports teach us, we will all be winners, strengthening the bonds that tie us
together.”
Despite the difference in the
tone and content of the message of the Brazilian bishops and that of the pope,
their underlying substance is not all that radically different. Both are
concerned with the dignity of the human person and the flourishing of human
society.
Francis encourages individuals to forgo selfishness and to seek peace and harmony with one another for the good of the entire human family, while the bishops urge those in positions of power to use the resources at their disposal for the advancement of the common good. Whereas the bishops spotlight the messiness of human society, the pope illuminates the ability of the individual to help tidy the mess.
Francis encourages individuals to forgo selfishness and to seek peace and harmony with one another for the good of the entire human family, while the bishops urge those in positions of power to use the resources at their disposal for the advancement of the common good. Whereas the bishops spotlight the messiness of human society, the pope illuminates the ability of the individual to help tidy the mess.
The bishops and the pope have the
same currency in hand; their messages are different sides of the same coin.
Flip the coin, and on both sides there is a call to conversion, healing and
renewal for the sake of social justice, or, in soccer lingo, “fair play”.
No comments:
Post a Comment